Question
Question 1
(3 points)
Two transformations were performed on Triangle ABC. The first transformation was a reflection over the
. The second transformation was a
. The second transformation was
and
.
Question 2
(1 point)
Are the shapes congruent? How do you know?
Skip to navigation
(3 points)
Two transformations were performed on Triangle ABC. The first transformation was a reflection over the
. The second transformation was a
. The second transformation was
and
.
Question 2
(1 point)
Are the shapes congruent? How do you know?
Skip to navigation
Answers
GPT-4o mini
**Question 1**
To complete this question, we need to specify the types of transformations applied to Triangle ABC. A common first transformation for triangles is a reflection over a line (e.g., the x-axis or y-axis). The second transformation could be a translation, rotation, or scaling.
1. The first transformation was a reflection over the **x-axis** (or another line, depending on your context).
2. The second transformation was a **translation** (or another transformation like rotation.
For example, if we specified a reflection over the x-axis followed by a translation 2 units to the right and 1 unit up, the completed sentences would be:
The first transformation was a reflection over the **x-axis**. The second transformation was a **translation** of **2 units right** and **1 unit up**.
---
**Question 2**
Yes, the shapes are congruent. Two shapes are considered congruent if one can be obtained from the other via rigid transformations, which include reflections, translations, and rotations. Since both transformations performed on Triangle ABC are rigid transformations, the resulting triangle will have the same shape and size as the original triangle, hence they are congruent.
To complete this question, we need to specify the types of transformations applied to Triangle ABC. A common first transformation for triangles is a reflection over a line (e.g., the x-axis or y-axis). The second transformation could be a translation, rotation, or scaling.
1. The first transformation was a reflection over the **x-axis** (or another line, depending on your context).
2. The second transformation was a **translation** (or another transformation like rotation.
For example, if we specified a reflection over the x-axis followed by a translation 2 units to the right and 1 unit up, the completed sentences would be:
The first transformation was a reflection over the **x-axis**. The second transformation was a **translation** of **2 units right** and **1 unit up**.
---
**Question 2**
Yes, the shapes are congruent. Two shapes are considered congruent if one can be obtained from the other via rigid transformations, which include reflections, translations, and rotations. Since both transformations performed on Triangle ABC are rigid transformations, the resulting triangle will have the same shape and size as the original triangle, hence they are congruent.