Question
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that due process:
was not as fundamental a right as equal protection.
could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment.
allowed the Fifth Amendment to be applied to state laws.
should apply to reversing Frank Palka’s conviction.
was not as fundamental a right as equal protection.
could not be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment.
allowed the Fifth Amendment to be applied to state laws.
should apply to reversing Frank Palka’s conviction.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
In the context of your question, it appears you might be referring to a specific Supreme Court case involving due process, but the phrasing is a bit unclear regarding which case you are referencing. However, generally speaking, the Supreme Court has held that due process is indeed a fundamental right, and it has been incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that the principles of due process apply to state laws as well as federal laws, aligning with the idea that states must not infringe on individuals' rights without proper legal procedures.
If you can provide more context or specify which case you are referring to, I would be happy to help clarify further!
If you can provide more context or specify which case you are referring to, I would be happy to help clarify further!