Question

Diamond TV reported sometime this year in August 2025 Councilors in Livingstone boycotted the handover ceremony of refuse truck alleging that the vehicle was expensive at its total cost of K 2 million. The CDF funds for this purchase as from the CDF.
(a) Discuss the composition of the Constituent Development Procurement Committee? 4 marks
(b) If the Constituent Development Procurement Committee was proactive how could they avoided this problem at hand? 5 marks
(c) Based on the knowledge acquired in Public Procurement how can this matter resolved? 6 marks with references phrase it if converted to microsoft word its worth 3 pages

Answers

GPT-4o mini
**(a) Composition of the Constituent Development Procurement Committee**

The Constituency Development Procurement Committee (CDPC) plays a crucial role in managing procurement processes at the constituency level. The composition typically includes the following:

1. **Chairperson:** Usually a constituency councilor or a community leader, responsible for overseeing the procurement processes and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.

2. **Secretary:** Often a representative from the local government or council office who is responsible for documentation, record-keeping, and communication within the committee.

3. **Treasurer:** A member tasked with managing budgets and finances related to procurement, ensuring that funds are used effectively and transparently.

4. **Members:** The committee also includes a group of elected representatives, such as community leaders, interest groups, and stakeholders, ensuring diverse input in procurement decisions. This could also involve representatives from local trade unions, women's groups, or youth organizations.

**(b) Proactive Measures to Avoid the Problem**

If the Constituency Development Procurement Committee (CDPC) had been proactive, they could have implemented several strategies to prevent the controversy surrounding the refuse truck procurement:

1. **Market Research:** Conducting thorough market research to understand the prevailing prices for refuse trucks and ensure that the selected vehicle had a competitive and justifiable cost.

2. **Stakeholder Engagement:** Engaging with community stakeholders, including councilors, before finalizing the procurement could have facilitated better communication and transparency regarding the selection process.

3. **Clear Procurement Guidelines:** Establishing clear procurement guidelines that align with the CDF regulations. This could involve specifying cost thresholds, acceptable vendor qualifications, and procurement processes to ensure all members are on the same page.

4. **Enhanced Accountability:** Instituting strict oversight mechanisms, including audits or reviews during the selection process, would help ensure that every decision is documented and accountable.

5. **Needs Assessment:** Conducting a comprehensive needs assessment within the community to determine the specifications for the refuse truck and validate the necessity of the purchase. This would ensure that the vehicle indeed addresses the community's waste management needs.

**(c) Resolution of the Matter Based on Public Procurement Knowledge**

To resolve the procurement issue surrounding the refuse truck, the committee could take several steps based on established public procurement principles:

1. **Conduct a Transparent Review Process:** The committee should initiate a review of the procurement process, including cost analysis and justification for the K 2 million expenditure. Engaging external auditors can lend credibility to this review.

2. **Public Consultation and Feedback:** Organizing a public meeting to discuss the procurement process and gather feedback from community members and other stakeholders can help in addressing grievances and providing clarity about the decisions made.

3. **Reevaluation of Procurement Policies:** The committee should reevaluate existing procurement policies and practices. This might include reinforcing compliance with national procurement guidelines, which can help in restoring public trust.

4. **Training and Capacity Building:** Providing training for the committee members on public procurement principles, ethics, and transparency can enhance their capability in managing future procurements effectively.

5. **Communication Strategy:** Developing and implementing a communication strategy to inform the public about the procurement process, cost justifications, and the use of CDF funds can enhance transparency and ensure citizen awareness.

6. **Sustainable Procurement Practices:** In the future, establishing a focus on sustainable procurement practices can ensure that purchases align with the social, environmental, and economic needs of the constituency. This approach may include assessing long-term operational costs versus initial purchase prices.

In conclusion, the issues arising from the refuse truck procurement highlight the need for improved transparency, community engagement, and adherence to established procurement standards. By adopting proactive measures and principles of effective public procurement, the Constituency Development Procurement Committee can address current challenges and foster a more trusting relationship with the community moving forward.

**References:**

- Public Procurement Act [insert year of the relevant legislation]
- Local Government Regulations on Procurement
- Best Practices in Public Procurement Management (Various Authors)

(Please note that the references section requires up-to-date citations and specific titles that align with your course materials or local laws. The information here is indicative.)