Question
Which statement best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship?
Government censorship is fine if there is a good reason.
Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.
Government censorship must further national interests.
Government censorship does not apply to opinions.
Government censorship is fine if there is a good reason.
Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.
Government censorship must further national interests.
Government censorship does not apply to opinions.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The statement that best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States is: **Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.**
In this case, the Court ruled against the government's attempt to impose prior restraint on the publication of the Pentagon Papers, emphasizing the strong protection for freedom of the press and the presumption against censorship, except in extreme circumstances.
In this case, the Court ruled against the government's attempt to impose prior restraint on the publication of the Pentagon Papers, emphasizing the strong protection for freedom of the press and the presumption against censorship, except in extreme circumstances.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!