Question
6. Dr. Patel and her team have been using GPS to track two plates that are moving toward
each other. Which diagram shows what is happening at the place where the plates are
moving toward each other?
a. Diagram A: Two plates are hitting each other, and the plates are breaking into
pieces, creating sand.
b. Diagram B: Two plates are pushing against each other, causing the edges to
bend upward.
c. Diagram C: One plate is going underneath the other plate and sinking into the
soft rock below.
d. Diagram D: One plate is going underneath the other plate and sinking into the
ocean below.
each other. Which diagram shows what is happening at the place where the plates are
moving toward each other?
a. Diagram A: Two plates are hitting each other, and the plates are breaking into
pieces, creating sand.
b. Diagram B: Two plates are pushing against each other, causing the edges to
bend upward.
c. Diagram C: One plate is going underneath the other plate and sinking into the
soft rock below.
d. Diagram D: One plate is going underneath the other plate and sinking into the
ocean below.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which diagram accurately represents the scenario where two tectonic plates are moving toward each other, we need to keep in mind the types of interactions between plates at convergent boundaries.
1. **Diagram A** describes two plates hitting each other and breaking into pieces, which suggests destructive activity but does not specifically represent the common outcomes of convergence.
2. **Diagram B** describes two plates pushing against each other and causing the edges to bend upward. This is a typical effect of converging plates, as they may create mountains or uplift due to the intense pressure at the boundary.
3. **Diagram C** describes one plate going underneath the other and sinking into the soft rock below. This scenario represents subduction, which is also a behavior observed at convergent boundaries, particularly where an oceanic plate meets a continental plate.
4. **Diagram D** describes one plate going underneath another and sinking into the ocean below, which is specifically indicative of an oceanic-continental or oceanic-oceanic convergence.
Given these interpretations, both Diagram B and Diagram C would be possible representations of two plates moving toward each other. Diagram B depicts uplift (which could result in mountain formation), while Diagram C specifically illustrates subduction.
If you are looking for the best representation of convergence with the potential for both uplift and subduction, **Diagram B** seems to encapsulate what happens in many convergent plate interactions where mountains are formed by uplift. If the focus is specifically on subduction, then **Diagram C** would be more fitting.
In summary:
- Choose **Diagram B** for general convergent behavior (uplifting).
- Choose **Diagram C** if subduction is the focus.
Without further context, **Diagram B** might be the most illustrative of the general convergence between two plates moving toward each other.
1. **Diagram A** describes two plates hitting each other and breaking into pieces, which suggests destructive activity but does not specifically represent the common outcomes of convergence.
2. **Diagram B** describes two plates pushing against each other and causing the edges to bend upward. This is a typical effect of converging plates, as they may create mountains or uplift due to the intense pressure at the boundary.
3. **Diagram C** describes one plate going underneath the other and sinking into the soft rock below. This scenario represents subduction, which is also a behavior observed at convergent boundaries, particularly where an oceanic plate meets a continental plate.
4. **Diagram D** describes one plate going underneath another and sinking into the ocean below, which is specifically indicative of an oceanic-continental or oceanic-oceanic convergence.
Given these interpretations, both Diagram B and Diagram C would be possible representations of two plates moving toward each other. Diagram B depicts uplift (which could result in mountain formation), while Diagram C specifically illustrates subduction.
If you are looking for the best representation of convergence with the potential for both uplift and subduction, **Diagram B** seems to encapsulate what happens in many convergent plate interactions where mountains are formed by uplift. If the focus is specifically on subduction, then **Diagram C** would be more fitting.
In summary:
- Choose **Diagram B** for general convergent behavior (uplifting).
- Choose **Diagram C** if subduction is the focus.
Without further context, **Diagram B** might be the most illustrative of the general convergence between two plates moving toward each other.