The flapper, a symbol of the 1920s women's liberation movement, challenged traditional societal norms and expectations regarding women's behavior, fashion, and independence. Whether she is asking too much of her parents can be viewed from different perspectives.
Arguments for the flapper asking too much:
-
Cultural Shift: The flapper embodies a dramatic shift in cultural values. Parents who grew up in more conservative environments may struggle to understand or accept their daughter's desire for greater freedom, leading to conflict.
-
Social Expectations: Flappers often rejected traditional roles, which could create tension. Parents might feel that their children are disregarding the values and expectations they were raised with, leading to a perceived sense of entitlement.
-
Financial Burden: The flapper lifestyle, with its focus on fashion, socializing, and nightlife, could place a financial strain on families, especially during a time when the economy was still recovering from World War I.
Arguments against the flapper asking too much:
-
Personal Freedom: The flapper's quest for independence and self-expression can be seen as a natural evolution of individual rights, suggesting that parents should support their children's desire for autonomy and self-discovery.
-
Changing Times: The 1920s was a period of significant social change. Supporting a flapper might be viewed as embracing progress and adapting to new societal norms rather than clinging to outdated values.
-
Empowerment: The flapper represents empowerment, and parents might find pride in their daughters' bravery to challenge conventions and pursue their own paths, ultimately leading to greater equality and opportunity for future generations.
In summary, whether the flapper is asking too much of her parents depends on the parents' perspectives and values. While there may be initial resistance, the broader context of social change suggests that supporting a flapper could ultimately lead to positive growth for both daughters and their families.