The most relevant comparison to the theory that enslaved people in Mesopotamian households experienced significant benefits might be the view that "Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had." This response emphasizes the distinctions between the experiences of enslaved individuals and those of free members of the household, highlighting that while some benefits might have existed for enslaved people, they would not equate to the rights, privileges, and social standing of free individuals. This acknowledges the complexity of their situation while also maintaining a critical view on the limitations and challenges they faced compared to free members of society.
Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)
Responses
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
1 answer