Question

Which option correctly explains the long-term impacts of the forced removal of the Sac and Fox?(1 point)
Responses

The Sac and Fox were forced to share land in western Oklahoma with the Comanche, leading to conflict.
The Sac and Fox were forced to share land in western Oklahoma with the Comanche, leading to conflict.

The Sac and Fox were moved to Georgia and forced to march along the Trail of Tears.
The Sac and Fox were moved to Georgia and forced to march along the Trail of Tears.

The Sac and Fox were moved to land in Oklahoma that was broken up and reduced by the allotment policy.
The Sac and Fox were moved to land in Oklahoma that was broken up and reduced by the allotment policy.

The Sac and Fox settled along the Arkansas River and had to deal with new flooding patterns.

Answer 1

The correct option that explains the long-term impacts of the forced removal of the Sac and Fox is:

**The Sac and Fox were moved to land in Oklahoma that was broken up and reduced by the allotment policy.**

This reflects the historical context of how the U.S. government implemented policies that ultimately diminished the tribal lands of Native American groups like the Sac and Fox through allotment.