Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Answer 1

The theory that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households can be contrasted with the perspective that the benefits they received were not comparable to those of free members of the household. While some historians argue that inclusion in a household provided some level of security and potential for improved status, others maintain that enslaved people still faced significant restrictions and inequities that limited their agency and well-being in comparison to free individuals.

In summary, proponents of the beneficial aspects of household inclusion tend to focus on the potential for stability and social mobility, while critics argue that these benefits did not equate to true freedom or equality.