Which two errors does the list below contain?

If due prosess is followed in court:

The accused’s defense will be thoroughly and exhaustively presented.
Any admissable forensic evidence submitted should be valid.
Evidence must, in the accused’s defense, whether forensic or circumstantial, be relevant.

The list contains unparallel grammar


The punctuation and capitalisation are wrong


The list is unparallel in substance


The list contains spelling errors

1 answer

The list contains two errors:

  1. Spelling errors: "due prosess" should be "due process", and "admissable" should be spelled "admissible".

  2. The list is unparallel in substance: The items in the list vary in their focus; some refer to types of evidence and others to aspects of the legal defense process.

So, the two errors are spelling errors and the list being unparallel in substance.