Question

In a paragraph (4-5 sentences) and in your own words, compare how the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are alike and different
in giving power to national and state governments. Then, explain if the U.S. would be weaker or stronger today under the Articles. Use James
Madison's quote, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary," and connect it to at least one Founding Father's argument (5 points)

Answer 1

The Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution both aimed to establish a governing framework for the United States, but they differ significantly in how they distribute power between national and state governments. Under the Articles, the national government lacked authority, relying heavily on states for resources and decision-making, resulting in inefficiency. In contrast, the Constitution created a stronger federal government with defined powers, allowing it to regulate commerce, levy taxes, and maintain a military, while still preserving certain powers to the states. If the U.S. were still under the Articles, it would likely be weaker today due to the inability to respond effectively to national issues, as highlighted by James Madison's assertion that “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” This reflects Madison's and other Founding Fathers' belief that a strong, structured government is essential to manage human flaws, prevent tyranny, and maintain order, which the Articles failed to achieve.