The author leaves uncertain whether the efforts of Native organizers impacted voter turnout because they want the reader to draw a realistic conclusion. By presenting a mix of emotions and perspectives from Native organizers and advocates, the article highlights the complexity of the situation without definitively stating the outcome of voter turnout. This approach allows readers to consider the potential effects of the organizers' efforts while acknowledging the challenges and uncertainties that remain.
"Voting Access for Native Americans"
by Candice Norwood
Amid the legal battles and uncertainty, with just four weeks remaining to vote, Native organizers and
advocates expressed a mix of emotions about the weeks ahead.
The situation is "dire," De León said. "It's incredibly frustrating because these populations are completely ignored."
Cázares-Kelly in Arizona expressed hope for high voter turnout despite the setbacks.
"I think I'm really excited and motivated by so many people recognizing that all of us have been subjected to voter suppression tactics," Cázares-Kelly said. "It's been really amazing to see so many people standing up to it, and arming themselves with voter education and trying to share that and empower others."
Why does the author leave uncertain whether the efforts of Native organizers impacted voter turnout?
The article relies heavily on implied instead of explicit meaning. The article relies heavily on implied instead of explicit meaning. The article was published before the 2020 election took place. The article was published before the 2020 election took place. They wanted the reader to make an optimistic prediction about the 2020 election.They wanted the reader to make an optimistic prediction about the 2020 election.They wanted the reader to draw a realistic conclusion.
1 answer