Question
Which statement is an example providing evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation?(1 point)
Responses
Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.
Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.
Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.
Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.
Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.
Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.
Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.
Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.
Skip to navigation
Responses
Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.
Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.
Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.
Laws are rules that have been derived from repeated testing of theories, as in using the repeated testing of the theory of relativity to create a law associated with the potential for time travel.
Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.
Laws are used in reference to something that will often be true, such as the use of the law of universal gravitation while theories are ideas that may be well founded or may have no evidence to support them, such as the use of the theory of relativity.
Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.
Laws provide the physical principles of electric fields, while theories indicate how voltages will combine in a circuit.
Skip to navigation
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The statement that provides evidence that a scientific law is a description while a scientific theory is an explanation is:
**Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.**
This statement highlights how laws describe consistent patterns in nature (e.g., the behavior of forces) while theories explain the underlying mechanisms behind those patterns (e.g., electrostatic forces).
**Laws of motion state that for any action force, there is an equal and opposite reaction force, while theories state that contact forces are due to electrostatic forces between the charged particles that make up matter.**
This statement highlights how laws describe consistent patterns in nature (e.g., the behavior of forces) while theories explain the underlying mechanisms behind those patterns (e.g., electrostatic forces).
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!