Pocahontas (1995) Your review must be one to two pages, typed (double-spaced and 12 pt.

Times New Roman font). It must begin with the title of the movie, the year it was released, and the
name of the director. You must answer the following questions in the course of your paper.

A. If the film is based upon an historical event or person, how true to life is the film? Is the film
fact or fiction? Is there inaccurate information? Were popular stereotypes about different kinds
of people challenged or reinforced?

B. Describe the main characters. Briefly summarize the plot.

C. What did you enjoy about the film? Are there things about the film that you disliked and what
were they?

1 answer

Pocahontas (1995)
Director: Mike Gabriel and Eric Goldberg

"Pocahontas," released in 1995, is an animated film produced by Disney that tells a fictionalized version of the historical events surrounding the Native American woman Pocahontas and her interactions with English settler John Smith. As is often the case with Disney adaptations, the film takes significant artistic liberties, blending historical figures with narrative choices that prioritize entertainment and moral storytelling over factual accuracy.

A. The film is based on the life of Pocahontas, a Native American woman, and her encounters with English colonizers in the early 17th century. However, the historical accuracy of "Pocahontas" is questionable, as it amalgamates various elements of her life and creates a romance between Pocahontas and John Smith that is not supported by historical records. Pocahontas was actually a young girl during Smith's time in Jamestown, and their meeting was more complex than depicted in the film. Additionally, the portrayal of Native American cultures and the arrival of colonizers simplifies a much more nuanced history involving violence, displacement, and cultural clashes. The film reinforces some popular stereotypes about Native Americans, depicting them as mystical and deeply in tune with nature, which can detract from their real histories and diverse cultures. While it attempts to challenge stereotypes by showcasing Pocahontas as a strong and independent figure, the overarching narrative still leans towards romanticized portrayals of both Native Americans and colonial settlers.

B. The main characters of "Pocahontas" include Pocahontas herself, voiced by Judy Kuhn, a free-spirited and adventurous young woman who seeks to understand the world beyond her tribal boundaries. John Smith, voiced by Mel Gibson, represents the English settlers and embodies the archetype of the noble hero, conflicted between his loyalty to his people and his growing affection for Pocahontas. Other notable characters are Pocahontas’s friend Nakoma, who often acts as her voice of reason, and Chief Powhatan, Pocahontas’s father, who is protective of his tribe. The plot revolves around the arrival of English settlers in Virginia, the burgeoning relationship between Pocahontas and John Smith, and the resulting conflict between the two cultures. Throughout the film, Pocahontas learns about the values of love and peace, ultimately striving to bridge the gap between her people and the newcomers.

C. One of the aspects I enjoyed most about "Pocahontas" was its stunning animation and musical score, including memorable songs such as "Colors of the Wind," which convey profound themes about nature, respect, and understanding different cultures. The visual artistry is vibrant and captures the beauty of both the natural environment and the characters’ emotions, contributing to a visually engaging experience. However, one notable downside is the film's historical inaccuracies, which I found disheartening. By oversimplifying and romanticizing historical events, the film risks perpetuating misconceptions about Native American history and culture. Additionally, while the film makes an effort to portray strong female characters, it often places them within the context of a romantic plot, which can detract from their independence and agency. Overall, "Pocahontas" is a visually beautiful and emotionally resonant film but falls short in its representation of history, challenging the viewer to discern between fact and fiction within its narrative.