To determine whether the relation represented by the mapping diagram is a function, we need to recall the definition of a function: a relation is a function if every input (x-value) is associated with exactly one output (y-value).
In the mapping you described, we can analyze the relationships:
- \( x = -4 \) maps to \( y = -5 \) (one output)
- \( x = -2 \) maps to \( y = -3 \) (one output)
- \( x = 0 \) maps to both \( y = -4 \) and \( y = -2 \) (two outputs)
- \( x = 1 \) maps to \( y = -3 \) (one output)
- \( x = 3 \) maps to \( y = -1 \) (one output)
The crucial point is that the x-value \( 0 \) is associated with two different y-values (\( -4 \) and \( -2 \)). This means that for the input \( 0 \), there is not exactly one output.
Therefore, the relation is not a function because for the input \( 0 \), there are two outputs.
The correct explanation would be: No, because for each input there is not exactly one output.