The statement that "Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes" is the most accurate evaluation of the impact of money generated by citizen activism. Financial contributions from grassroots movements and citizen-led initiatives can influence political campaigns, support candidates aligned with the activists' goals, and ultimately shape electoral results. While the other statements may hold some truth in specific contexts, changing electoral outcomes is a broader and more direct consequence of financial support in activism.
page 35 of 35
2 of 52 of 5 Items
Question
Which of the following is an accurate evaluation of the impact of money generated by citizen activism?(1 point)
Responses
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing how members of Congress vote.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing how members of Congress vote.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in controlling the news cycle.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in controlling the news cycle.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in deciding which demonstrations receive coverage.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in deciding which demonstrations receive coverage.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes.
Money generated by citizen activism can be very effective in changing electoral outcomes.
Skip to navigation
1 answer