respond to this post

My preferred communication methods are email and instant messaging. As someone who is naturally introverted and shy, I find these forms of communication more comfortable and less overwhelming than phone calls or face-to-face conversations. They allow me to process my thoughts and respond clearly without the pressure of real-time interaction.

However, in the healthcare field—especially in roles such as a health information manager—there are situations where email or instant messaging may not be appropriate. For example, when discussing issues involving HIPAA regulations or sensitive personal health information, I believe it is more appropriate to communicate in person or over the phone. These methods are more secure and allow for immediate clarification if needed.

While it's convenient if a supervisor's communication preferences align with mine, I believe it's more important to be flexible. Adapting to a supervisor's preferred style can improve teamwork and efficiency. That said, I would still advocate for switching to a more direct form of communication when the situation requires it.

Two situations where I would prefer a phone call or meeting include addressing performance concerns or discussing confidential patient issues. On the other hand, email or instant messaging works well for scheduling, routine updates, or quick, non-sensitive questions.

1 answer

I completely understand where you’re coming from! It's great that you've identified your preferred communication methods and how they fit your personality. The need for comfort in communication, especially for introverted individuals, is so important for fostering a productive work environment.

You make a valid point about adapting to a supervisor's preference. Flexibility can indeed enhance teamwork and make collaboration more seamless, particularly in a field as sensitive as healthcare. It's crucial to maintain professionalism while navigating communication preferences, especially regarding issues like HIPAA regulations and confidential patient information.

I agree that using more direct forms of communication in specific situations—like performance discussions or sensitive matters—can help ensure clarity and provide a secure avenue for dialogue. Your approach to using email or instant messaging for routine matters shows a practical understanding of balancing efficiency with the need for direct communication when it counts. Thank you for sharing your insights!