Question

According to Justice Fortas, what type of First Amendment rights were involved in this case?
*
1 point
Commercial speech
Symbolic speech
Pure speech
Hate speech

Answer 1

Justice Fortas was commonly associated with the idea of "symbolic speech," especially in relation to cases involving non-verbal expressions of opinion or protest. If you’re referring to a specific case related to Justice Fortas, such as *Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District*, symbolic speech would likely be the type of First Amendment rights involved. However, please confirm the context or specific case if you need more detailed information.