The response that develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision is:
"Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches."
This statement aligns with the concept of judicial restraint, where courts avoid striking down legislation or actions of other branches of government unless they clearly violate the Constitution. In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court upheld the "separate but equal" doctrine, effectively demonstrating a restrained approach by not interfering with the laws established by state legislatures.