The analysis of the lab practical indicates a significant difference in the antibacterial effectiveness of the plant-derived skincare products compared to the controls, as demonstrated by an F-value of 16.835 and a p-value of 0.00023, both of which suggest a strong statistical significance. Given that the p-value is far below the conventional threshold of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis (H0), which posited that there would be no significant difference in effectiveness. This outcome supports the alternative hypothesis (H1), which asserts that at least one of the plant-derived products exhibits a greater antibacterial effectiveness than the negative control and is comparable to or superior to the positive control, Ceftriaxone. The notable F-value exceeding the critical value (3.47805) reinforces this conclusion, indicating that the observed results are unlikely to have occurred by chance. This aligns with previous research that has explored the antibacterial properties of various plant extracts, suggesting a promising avenue for developing natural skincare products that can effectively combat bacterial growth. Future research could investigate the specific mechanisms by which these products exert their antibacterial effects, as well as their efficacy in treating real-world infections, thus enhancing their applicability in clinical settings. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of plant-derived skincare products as effective antibacterial agents, paving the way for further exploration in the realm of natural antimicrobial therapies.
Using the information given below with the results from the lab practical, Acknowledge when a hypothesis may be incorrect. Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis which is rejected and why. State your explanation in detail in one paragraph
F value. 16.835
P value. 0.00023
F critical 3.47805
With a Honest Significant Difference (HSD) 0.04256
Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the antibacterial effectiveness of the plant-derived skincare products (herbal extracts, gentel, and macadamia oil) compared to the negative control (water) and the positive control (Ceftriaxone) in inhibiting bacterial growth as measured by the zones of inhibition on agar plates.
Alternate Hypothesis (H1): At least one of the plant-derived skincare products (herbal extracts, gentel, or macadamia oil) demonstrates a significantly greater antibacterial effectiveness in inhibiting bacterial growth compared to the negative control (water) and shows comparable or superior effectiveness to the positive control (Ceftriaxone) as measured by the zones of inhibition on agar plates.
Place your study within the context of previous studies.
Discuss potential future research.
Provide the reader with a “take-away”statement to end the report.
F value. 16.835
P value. 0.00023
F critical 3.47805
With a Honest Significant Difference (HSD) 0.04256
1 answer