Analyze the fundamental differences between native and adopted traditional political institutions in pre-colonial Pacific societies. How did this differences shape the colonial experience? Please answer must be in simple and in details. And it must be three sentences.

Answer 1

Native traditional political institutions in pre-colonial Pacific societies were often based on kinship, communal decision-making, and spiritual leadership, emphasizing social harmony and collective identity, while adopted traditional institutions, which were influenced by external powers or colonial practices, tended to prioritize hierarchical structures and centralized authority. This divergence meant that when colonial forces arrived, native systems were more adaptable and resilient, often blending with or resisting adopted frameworks, leading to varied responses to colonization. Consequently, societies with strong native institutions could maintain social cohesion and cultural identity despite external pressures, whereas those reliant on adopted systems often faced greater fragmentation and conflict during the colonial experience.