According to internalists in epistemology:

To know something, you do not need justification. As long as you have seen something for yourself you can know it.

You need to witness something yourself, to count as knowing it.

You need first person access to supporting evidence or reasons to count as knowing something.

It's possible to know even if you don't have first-person access to supporting evidence.

1 answer

According to internalists in epistemology, the most accurate statement is:

You need first-person access to supporting evidence or reasons to count as knowing something.

Internalism posits that the justification for a belief must come from factors that are internally accessible to the individual, such as one's own mental states, beliefs, and experiences. Thus, knowledge requires that the person has access to the reasons or evidence supporting their belief. The other statements do not accurately reflect the internalist perspective.