The critique that is most accurate regarding presidential systems of government from the options provided is:
Presidential systems of government are more likely to lead to divided government.
In presidential systems, the executive branch is separate from the legislative branch, which can lead to situations where different political parties control each branch. This division can result in gridlock and challenges in passing legislation, making it a valid critique of such systems.
The other options contain inaccuracies or oversimplifications. For example, the judicial branch typically has the power to review and potentially stop actions of the president, and in presidential systems, it is not the legislature that selects the head of the executive branch, rather the electorate does.