Question

Which claim is supported by the evidence in the table? (1 point) Responses Humans do not have any common ancestors with Species 2 or 3. Humans do not have any common ancestors with Species 2 or 3. Humans have the closest evolutionary relationship to Species 1. Humans have the closest evolutionary relationship to Species 1. Humans have the fewest common ancestors with Species 1 and 4. Humans have the fewest common ancestors with Species 1 and 4. Humans have the most distant evolutionary relationship to Species 4. Humans have the most distant evolutionary relationship to Species 4.

Answer 1

To determine which claim is supported by the evidence in the table, we would need to examine the specific data provided in that table regarding the evolutionary relationships and common ancestors between humans and Species 1, 2, 3, and 4.

However, based on the options provided, we could analyze them:

1. **Humans do not have any common ancestors with Species 2 or 3.**
- This claim asserts that there is no evolutionary link between humans and the other two species, which must be supported by evidence showing no common ancestors identified in the data.

2. **Humans have the closest evolutionary relationship to Species 1.**
- This would require that Species 1 has the most shared characteristics or common ancestors with humans compared to the other species.

3. **Humans have the fewest common ancestors with Species 1 and 4.**
- This claim implies that when comparing all four species, humans' common ancestors with Species 1 and 4 are fewer than with the other species.

4. **Humans have the most distant evolutionary relationship to Species 4.**
- This would need to be backed by evidence showing that the common ancestors with Species 4 are the least compared to the other species.

Without the specific details from the table, it is not possible to definitively choose which claim is supported. If you can provide the evidence from the table, I can help analyze it to select the correct claim.