Question
Some activists embraced non-violent civil disobedience, while others had more radical approaches. How were the approaches of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X different?(1 point)
Responses
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.
King used the religion of Islam to support his ideas, while Malcolm X was a devoted Christian leader.
Responses
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.
King used the religion of Islam to support his ideas, while Malcolm X was a devoted Christian leader.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
**King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.**
Martin Luther King, Jr. advocated for non-violent protest and civil disobedience as a means of achieving civil rights and justice, emphasizing love and non-violence. In contrast, Malcolm X, especially during his early years with the Nation of Islam, was open to the use of violence in self-defense and viewed it as a necessary response to systemic oppression.
**King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.**
Martin Luther King, Jr. advocated for non-violent protest and civil disobedience as a means of achieving civil rights and justice, emphasizing love and non-violence. In contrast, Malcolm X, especially during his early years with the Nation of Islam, was open to the use of violence in self-defense and viewed it as a necessary response to systemic oppression.