It looks like there may be a minor confusion in the definition of the piecewise function \( F(x) \). I'll interpret the function as follows:
\[ F(x) = \begin{cases} 2x + 1 & \text{if } x > 0 \ 3x & \text{if } x < 0 \end{cases} \]
Now, we will evaluate \( F(-3) \), \( F(-2) \), \( F(4) \), and \( F(2) \).
-
Evaluate \( F(-3) \):
- Since \(-3 < 0\), we use the second piece. \[ F(-3) = 3(-3) = -9 \]
-
Evaluate \( F(-2) \):
- Since \(-2 < 0\), we again use the second piece. \[ F(-2) = 3(-2) = -6 \]
-
Evaluate \( F(4) \):
- Since \(4 > 0\), we use the first piece. \[ F(4) = 2(4) + 1 = 8 + 1 = 9 \]
-
Evaluate \( F(2) \):
- Since \(2 > 0\), we use the first piece. \[ F(2) = 2(2) + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5 \]
Now, summarizing the evaluations:
- \( F(-3) = -9 \)
- \( F(-2) = -6 \)
- \( F(4) = 9 \)
- \( F(2) = 5 \)