Question
In this section, you’ll assess another speaker’s stance by considering their point of view, use of evidence, and rhetoric.
Your followers have received the video very well. One viewer has left a comment where she claims that the endangered animal statistics that were shared from a scientific journal are incorrect. She posts a link to a video that directly contradicts your source.
How can you assess which source is correct: the video or the scientific journal?
Question 4 options:
Analyze the sources and their origins to determine if there are any biases, errors, and so on.
Trust the video because it was created in 2023, while the scientific journal was published in 2022.
Ask your followers which source they believe is correct.
Trust the scientific journal because it supports your viewpoint.
Your followers have received the video very well. One viewer has left a comment where she claims that the endangered animal statistics that were shared from a scientific journal are incorrect. She posts a link to a video that directly contradicts your source.
How can you assess which source is correct: the video or the scientific journal?
Question 4 options:
Analyze the sources and their origins to determine if there are any biases, errors, and so on.
Trust the video because it was created in 2023, while the scientific journal was published in 2022.
Ask your followers which source they believe is correct.
Trust the scientific journal because it supports your viewpoint.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The best option for assessing which source is correct is:
**Analyze the sources and their origins to determine if there are any biases, errors, and so on.**
This approach allows you to critically evaluate the credibility of both the scientific journal and the video, taking into account factors such as the reputation of the authors, the methodology used to gather data, and the peer-review process for the journal. It promotes a thoughtful and evidence-based decision rather than relying on superficial factors like publication date or personal biases.
**Analyze the sources and their origins to determine if there are any biases, errors, and so on.**
This approach allows you to critically evaluate the credibility of both the scientific journal and the video, taking into account factors such as the reputation of the authors, the methodology used to gather data, and the peer-review process for the journal. It promotes a thoughtful and evidence-based decision rather than relying on superficial factors like publication date or personal biases.