In this section, you’ll assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text. You’ll also demonstrate an understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings.

Question

You continue to focus on the response article. As you read it, you realize it’s well-written. You start asking yourself different focus questions to determine why.

“Boomers. Karens. Debbie Downers. We all know them. We all despise them. These are the ones whose life’s calling is to rid education of the plague known as technology. They insist on a return to “the good old days,” where math is calculated by abacus, and you have to know how to calculate by hand a2 + b2 = c2 because “you won’t always have a calculator.” This is the generation that champions mindlessly staring at textbooks from 1965 while copying word-for-word on thousands of sheets of loose-leaf paper that will most likely end up in the cavernous depths of a backpack next to a moldy peanut butter sandwich while a child insists, 'I turned it in. You must have lost it.'”

After reading the article, how would you explain the author's point of view as it relates to the tone?
Question 7 options:

The author employs a straightforward tone to prove that all technology should be banned in educational settings.

The author employs a neutral tone to acknowledge both sides of an argument regarding technology.

The author employs a respectful tone to illustrate that elders in a community deserve admiration.

The author employs a sarcastic tone to showcase the outdated methods of education before technology.

Answer 1

The correct option is:

The author employs a sarcastic tone to showcase the outdated methods of education before technology.

In the excerpt, the author uses sarcasm to criticize the perspectives of those who resist technological advancements in education. Phrases like "the good old days," "mindlessly staring at textbooks from 1965," and the exaggerated description of a child insisting "I turned it in" illustrate a mocking attitude towards those who cling to traditional, outdated educational methods. This choice of tone effectively conveys the author's criticism of anti-technology stances in education.