Responses
It is cheaper to fund flood mitigation projects than to pay for repairs after flooding has occurred.
It is cheaper to fund flood mitigation projects than to pay for repairs after flooding has occurred.
It costs roughly the same to fund flood mitigation projects as paying for repairs after flooding has occurred.
It costs roughly the same to fund flood mitigation projects as paying for repairs after flooding has occurred.
Minimal research has been done comparing the costs of funding flood mitigation projects to the cost of repairs after flooding has occurred.
Minimal research has been done comparing the costs of funding flood mitigation projects to the cost of repairs after flooding has occurred.
It is cheaper to pay for repairs after flooding has occurred than to fund flood mitigation projects.
1 answer
The statement that is typically considered true is:
It is cheaper to fund flood mitigation projects than to pay for repairs after flooding has occurred.
Numerous studies and analyses have shown that investing in flood mitigation measures can significantly reduce the costs associated with flood damage, making proactive investments generally more economical than reactive repairs.
