Question
Use the speech excerpt to answer the question.
Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker’s argument?
(1 point)
Responses
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
Skip to navigation
Which evidence included in the second paragraph is least relevant to the speaker’s argument?
(1 point)
Responses
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
And finally, our neighboring town of Westmont also named its library by a vote.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
Citizens reported that they felt the process was fairer.
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
A higher percentage of people approved of building names compared to instances where names were decided through contests.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries.
Skip to navigation
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The evidence that is least relevant to the speaker's argument is:
"Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries."
This statement discusses the speed of the voting process rather than directly supporting the fairness or approval aspects of the naming process, which are likely the key focus of the argument.
"Having a vote is a faster process than judging individual contest entries."
This statement discusses the speed of the voting process rather than directly supporting the fairness or approval aspects of the naming process, which are likely the key focus of the argument.