Question

Terrorism is based on the mistaken belief that a small number of violent acts that target symbolic and meaningful places and events important to the adversary can enable them to achieve political goals. Secondly, terrorists always underestimate the strong revulsion and disgust that the majority of human beings feels toward acts of political violence.

The article makes the following argument:

In a short paragraph, explain the argument that the author is making. Do you agree or disagree with his claim?

Answer 1

The author argues that terrorism is rooted in a flawed understanding of how violence can influence political outcomes, suggesting that perpetrators mistakenly believe that a few high-profile attacks can effectively sway public opinion or achieve their objectives. Furthermore, the author emphasizes that terrorists often fail to recognize the overwhelming moral outrage and repulsion that the general public has toward such violent acts. I agree with this claim, as it underscores the disconnect between the intentions of terrorists and the actual reactions of society, highlighting that political violence often alienates rather than mobilizes support for a cause.