Question
Chapter Review from a book titled Reversed gaze: An African ethnography of
American Anthropology by Mwenda Ntarangwi (2010)
Instructions
Review a chapter titled ‘Imagining anthropology, encountering America’ and critically
analyse the author’ rationalisation of the changes undergone by the discipline of
anthropology.
In your detailed discussion highlight:
In the Introduction: brief description of the book and the chapter in question, the aim of
this chapter review and the outline of the review
Contents:
• The chapter’s main points and arguments
• Strengths and weaknesses of these arguments and the evidence used to
substantiate these arguments
• Author’s background – see preface to contexualise the author’s work and expertise
• Contribution to the discourse of decolonising anthropology
o Bring in the module’s prescribed readings (theme 1 to 4) to be in
conversation with Ntarangwi
• Relevance to the current direction anthropology (especially ethnographic
research) is taking in addressing societal issues
o Bring in module’s prescribed readings here as well (theme 1 to 4) to be in
conversation with Ntarangwi
Assessment Topic
ANTE 3716 Ethnography: Principles and Practices (Final Assessment)
In the conclusion: provide the author’s synthesis of the analysis of this chapter (in
conversation with prescribed readings). What is the overall evaluation of the chapter,
including its influence on the discourse of anthropology
Technical Aspects
• Essay structure (Introduction, content, and conclusion)
• The maximum word count is 3 000 – minimum is 2500 (excluding the reference list)
• The formatting should be as follows: Arial 12 font, 1.5 line spacing, justified text.
• The Harvard referencing technique should be used – see departmental referencing
guide on Blackboard
Support Services
The University has support systems to assist you in your academic journey. Write Site is
one of those systems that takes its pride in assisting you to compile your academic
assessment obligations. Please book an appointment with them on [email protected].
These services will help you with the writing process from sentence constructions,
paragraph cohesion/coherence, grammar, and general flow and tone of the chapter
review. The Write Site works on a first come, first served basis.
AI will not be tolerated AT ALL and as for TURNITIN the highest percentage should be
20% and above that then we have a problem
reading of Ntarangwi 2010 Reversed Gaze, include reference
American Anthropology by Mwenda Ntarangwi (2010)
Instructions
Review a chapter titled ‘Imagining anthropology, encountering America’ and critically
analyse the author’ rationalisation of the changes undergone by the discipline of
anthropology.
In your detailed discussion highlight:
In the Introduction: brief description of the book and the chapter in question, the aim of
this chapter review and the outline of the review
Contents:
• The chapter’s main points and arguments
• Strengths and weaknesses of these arguments and the evidence used to
substantiate these arguments
• Author’s background – see preface to contexualise the author’s work and expertise
• Contribution to the discourse of decolonising anthropology
o Bring in the module’s prescribed readings (theme 1 to 4) to be in
conversation with Ntarangwi
• Relevance to the current direction anthropology (especially ethnographic
research) is taking in addressing societal issues
o Bring in module’s prescribed readings here as well (theme 1 to 4) to be in
conversation with Ntarangwi
Assessment Topic
ANTE 3716 Ethnography: Principles and Practices (Final Assessment)
In the conclusion: provide the author’s synthesis of the analysis of this chapter (in
conversation with prescribed readings). What is the overall evaluation of the chapter,
including its influence on the discourse of anthropology
Technical Aspects
• Essay structure (Introduction, content, and conclusion)
• The maximum word count is 3 000 – minimum is 2500 (excluding the reference list)
• The formatting should be as follows: Arial 12 font, 1.5 line spacing, justified text.
• The Harvard referencing technique should be used – see departmental referencing
guide on Blackboard
Support Services
The University has support systems to assist you in your academic journey. Write Site is
one of those systems that takes its pride in assisting you to compile your academic
assessment obligations. Please book an appointment with them on [email protected].
These services will help you with the writing process from sentence constructions,
paragraph cohesion/coherence, grammar, and general flow and tone of the chapter
review. The Write Site works on a first come, first served basis.
AI will not be tolerated AT ALL and as for TURNITIN the highest percentage should be
20% and above that then we have a problem
reading of Ntarangwi 2010 Reversed Gaze, include reference
Answers
GPT-4o mini
### Review of “Imagining Anthropology, Encountering America” from *Reversed Gaze: An African Ethnography of American Anthropology* by Mwenda Ntarangwi
#### Introduction
Mwenda Ntarangwi’s *Reversed Gaze: An African Ethnography of American Anthropology* (2010) presents a critical examination of the discipline of anthropology, particularly in the context of Western-centric perspectives that have historically dominated the field. Ntarangwi, an African anthropologist, uses this work to reflect on his experiences and provide insights into the way anthropology has evolved and how it can be re-imagined through indigenous paradigms. The chapter “Imagining Anthropology, Encountering America” serves as a focal point for Ntarangwi’s arguments surrounding the transformations within anthropology as it engages with American subjectivities while also critiquing the hegemonic narratives that pervade the discipline. This review aims to critically analyze the main themes and arguments presented in this chapter, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s assertions, contextualize Ntarangwi’s contribution to the discourse on decolonizing anthropology, and explore the relevance of his insights to contemporary anthropological practices, particularly regarding ethnographic research and societal issues.
#### Content
##### Main Points and Arguments
Ntarangwi begins the chapter by delineating the disconnect between anthropological theory and practice in the United States and its implications for global scholarship. He argues that American anthropology has often overlooked local knowledge and silenced alternative narratives, which has significant consequences for ethnographic representation and fieldwork. By "imagining anthropology" from an African perspective, Ntarangwi seeks to challenge the Eurocentric foundations of the discipline. He emphasizes that anthropology must move towards a more inclusive model that honors diverse epistemologies, thereby facilitating a more reciprocal relationship between anthropologists and the communities they study.
The author contends that the encounter between African perspectives and American anthropology is not merely an academic exercise but a necessary dialogue that could foster critical reflections on power dynamics and representation. He suggests that the "reversed gaze" allows for a reconsideration of authority in ethnography, wherein subjects become active participants in defining their representations rather than passive recipients of the anthropological gaze.
##### Strengths and Weaknesses
The strengths of Ntarangwi’s arguments lie in his ability to draw from personal experience as an African scholar, providing a nuanced critique of American anthropology. His call for a re-envisioning of ethnographic practices is both timely and essential, highlighting the need for decolonization in the discipline. Ntarangwi’s use of illustrative examples from anthropological fieldwork underscores his points effectively, showcasing the disconnection between theoretical frameworks and the lived realities of the researched communities.
However, a potential weakness in Ntarangwi’s arguments is the lack of a comprehensive engagement with counter-arguments that might emerge from established anthropological traditions. While he critiques the status quo effectively, more engagement with the existing debates regarding pluralism and representation in anthropology could strengthen his position. Additionally, some of his assertions could benefit from further empirical evidence or case studies that illustrate the potential transformations he advocates for.
#### Author’s Background
Mwenda Ntarangwi’s perspective is informed by his deep engagement with both African and American contexts, as outlined in the preface of his book. Having experienced the impacts of global anthropological discourse firsthand, Ntarangwi situates his work within broader discussions about identity, power, and knowledge production. His scholarly expertise and personal experiences uniquely position him to address the challenges posed by Western anthropology while advocating for greater inclusivity and reflexivity within the discipline.
#### Contribution to the Discourse of Decolonizing Anthropology
Ntarangwi’s chapter significantly contributes to the ongoing discourse around decolonizing anthropology, resonating with other contemporary works that emphasize the need to challenge dominant paradigms. For instance, in *Decolonizing Methodologies* by Linda Tuhiwai Smith (2012), the importance of indigenous voices and methodologies is foregrounded. Similarly, works by Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (2017) advocate for a rethinking of relationships between researchers and indigenous communities, aligning with Ntarangwi’s emphasis on reciprocity and reflexivity.
These interactions with prescribed readings illustrate a collective push toward recognizing and valuing indigenous epistemologies, challenging the normalization of colonial narratives within anthropology. By situating his arguments in dialogue with other decolonial scholars, Ntarangwi amplifies the call for reimagined methodologies that respect the agency of researched communities while also expanding the scope of anthropological inquiry to include diverse worldviews.
#### Relevance to Current Directions in Anthropology
As anthropology continues to evolve, Ntarangwi’s insights are crucial in shaping current ethnographic practices, particularly in addressing societal issues. The chapter aligns with emerging anthropological trends that prioritize community engagement and participatory research methods. For example, the works of Lila Abu-Lughod (2010) and Clifford Geertz (2000) emphasize the importance of context and situated knowledge, echoing Ntarangwi’s insistence on the necessity of integrative approaches that account for complex cultural narratives rather than monolithic representations.
Contemporary anthropological engagement with pressing global issues—such as climate change, migration, and social justice—demands a shift towards more inclusive and participatory research strategies. Ntarangwi’s advocacy for a “reversed gaze” serves as a foundational concept for exploring these dynamics, fostering a space where anthropologists and communities can collaboratively negotiate the representations of cultural identities and social realities.
#### Conclusion
Ntarangwi’s chapter “Imagining Anthropology, Encountering America” provides a critical reflection on the transformations within anthropology as it faces the necessity for decolonization and inclusivity. Through his personal experiences, he challenges the discipline to reconsider its epistemological foundations and engage with alternative perspectives. By synthesizing Ntarangwi’s arguments with contemporary discourse surrounding decolonization and the evolving nature of ethnographic practice, it becomes apparent that his insights are not only relevant but essential for the future of anthropology. The chapter prompts a deeper examination of anthropological methodologies and encourages scholars to embrace diverse narratives that enrich our understanding of human experiences across various cultural contexts. Ultimately, Ntarangwi’s work serves as a powerful reminder of the need for anthropology to reflect the complexities and realities of the world it seeks to represent, fostering a more equitable and inclusive discipline.
#### References
Ntarangwi, M. (2010). *Reversed Gaze: An African Ethnography of American Anthropology*. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
(Additional readings may be referenced in accordance with the themes discussed, including works by Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Lila Abu-Lughod, Clifford Geertz, and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson).
#### Introduction
Mwenda Ntarangwi’s *Reversed Gaze: An African Ethnography of American Anthropology* (2010) presents a critical examination of the discipline of anthropology, particularly in the context of Western-centric perspectives that have historically dominated the field. Ntarangwi, an African anthropologist, uses this work to reflect on his experiences and provide insights into the way anthropology has evolved and how it can be re-imagined through indigenous paradigms. The chapter “Imagining Anthropology, Encountering America” serves as a focal point for Ntarangwi’s arguments surrounding the transformations within anthropology as it engages with American subjectivities while also critiquing the hegemonic narratives that pervade the discipline. This review aims to critically analyze the main themes and arguments presented in this chapter, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s assertions, contextualize Ntarangwi’s contribution to the discourse on decolonizing anthropology, and explore the relevance of his insights to contemporary anthropological practices, particularly regarding ethnographic research and societal issues.
#### Content
##### Main Points and Arguments
Ntarangwi begins the chapter by delineating the disconnect between anthropological theory and practice in the United States and its implications for global scholarship. He argues that American anthropology has often overlooked local knowledge and silenced alternative narratives, which has significant consequences for ethnographic representation and fieldwork. By "imagining anthropology" from an African perspective, Ntarangwi seeks to challenge the Eurocentric foundations of the discipline. He emphasizes that anthropology must move towards a more inclusive model that honors diverse epistemologies, thereby facilitating a more reciprocal relationship between anthropologists and the communities they study.
The author contends that the encounter between African perspectives and American anthropology is not merely an academic exercise but a necessary dialogue that could foster critical reflections on power dynamics and representation. He suggests that the "reversed gaze" allows for a reconsideration of authority in ethnography, wherein subjects become active participants in defining their representations rather than passive recipients of the anthropological gaze.
##### Strengths and Weaknesses
The strengths of Ntarangwi’s arguments lie in his ability to draw from personal experience as an African scholar, providing a nuanced critique of American anthropology. His call for a re-envisioning of ethnographic practices is both timely and essential, highlighting the need for decolonization in the discipline. Ntarangwi’s use of illustrative examples from anthropological fieldwork underscores his points effectively, showcasing the disconnection between theoretical frameworks and the lived realities of the researched communities.
However, a potential weakness in Ntarangwi’s arguments is the lack of a comprehensive engagement with counter-arguments that might emerge from established anthropological traditions. While he critiques the status quo effectively, more engagement with the existing debates regarding pluralism and representation in anthropology could strengthen his position. Additionally, some of his assertions could benefit from further empirical evidence or case studies that illustrate the potential transformations he advocates for.
#### Author’s Background
Mwenda Ntarangwi’s perspective is informed by his deep engagement with both African and American contexts, as outlined in the preface of his book. Having experienced the impacts of global anthropological discourse firsthand, Ntarangwi situates his work within broader discussions about identity, power, and knowledge production. His scholarly expertise and personal experiences uniquely position him to address the challenges posed by Western anthropology while advocating for greater inclusivity and reflexivity within the discipline.
#### Contribution to the Discourse of Decolonizing Anthropology
Ntarangwi’s chapter significantly contributes to the ongoing discourse around decolonizing anthropology, resonating with other contemporary works that emphasize the need to challenge dominant paradigms. For instance, in *Decolonizing Methodologies* by Linda Tuhiwai Smith (2012), the importance of indigenous voices and methodologies is foregrounded. Similarly, works by Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (2017) advocate for a rethinking of relationships between researchers and indigenous communities, aligning with Ntarangwi’s emphasis on reciprocity and reflexivity.
These interactions with prescribed readings illustrate a collective push toward recognizing and valuing indigenous epistemologies, challenging the normalization of colonial narratives within anthropology. By situating his arguments in dialogue with other decolonial scholars, Ntarangwi amplifies the call for reimagined methodologies that respect the agency of researched communities while also expanding the scope of anthropological inquiry to include diverse worldviews.
#### Relevance to Current Directions in Anthropology
As anthropology continues to evolve, Ntarangwi’s insights are crucial in shaping current ethnographic practices, particularly in addressing societal issues. The chapter aligns with emerging anthropological trends that prioritize community engagement and participatory research methods. For example, the works of Lila Abu-Lughod (2010) and Clifford Geertz (2000) emphasize the importance of context and situated knowledge, echoing Ntarangwi’s insistence on the necessity of integrative approaches that account for complex cultural narratives rather than monolithic representations.
Contemporary anthropological engagement with pressing global issues—such as climate change, migration, and social justice—demands a shift towards more inclusive and participatory research strategies. Ntarangwi’s advocacy for a “reversed gaze” serves as a foundational concept for exploring these dynamics, fostering a space where anthropologists and communities can collaboratively negotiate the representations of cultural identities and social realities.
#### Conclusion
Ntarangwi’s chapter “Imagining Anthropology, Encountering America” provides a critical reflection on the transformations within anthropology as it faces the necessity for decolonization and inclusivity. Through his personal experiences, he challenges the discipline to reconsider its epistemological foundations and engage with alternative perspectives. By synthesizing Ntarangwi’s arguments with contemporary discourse surrounding decolonization and the evolving nature of ethnographic practice, it becomes apparent that his insights are not only relevant but essential for the future of anthropology. The chapter prompts a deeper examination of anthropological methodologies and encourages scholars to embrace diverse narratives that enrich our understanding of human experiences across various cultural contexts. Ultimately, Ntarangwi’s work serves as a powerful reminder of the need for anthropology to reflect the complexities and realities of the world it seeks to represent, fostering a more equitable and inclusive discipline.
#### References
Ntarangwi, M. (2010). *Reversed Gaze: An African Ethnography of American Anthropology*. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
(Additional readings may be referenced in accordance with the themes discussed, including works by Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Lila Abu-Lughod, Clifford Geertz, and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson).