A "rigid constitution" refers to a type of constitution that is difficult to amend or change. This rigidity is typically characterized by specific procedures and requirements that must be met in order to alter the constitution's provisions. Rigid constitutions are designed to maintain stability and continuity in a legal and political framework, protecting fundamental rights and principles from frequent modifications that could undermine their integrity.
Key features of a rigid constitution include:
-
Complex Amendment Procedure: The process for amending the constitution is usually more complicated than that for ordinary legislation. This could involve supermajority votes in the legislature, approval by referendums, or the involvement of multiple governmental bodies.
-
Protection of Fundamental Rights: Rigid constitutions often embed fundamental rights and principles that are intended to be safeguarded from legislative changes, ensuring that certain core values remain intact.
-
Stability and Predictability: By making it difficult to amend, rigid constitutions contribute to a stable legal environment where citizens can rely on established laws and rights.
-
Examples: Countries like the United States and Germany have rigid constitutions. In the U.S., for instance, the Constitution can only be amended through a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states.
In contrast, a "flexible constitution" allows for easier amendments, making it simpler to adapt to changing social, political, or economic conditions but may also lead to instability and rapid changes in the legal framework.