If the Sun were replaced by a red supergiant star that is ten times more massive than the Sun, we need to consider the effects of the increased mass on Earth's orbit and rotation.
-
Orbital Dynamics: The gravitational force exerted by an object on another is based on its mass. A more massive star would exert stronger gravitational pull on the planets in its orbit. As a result, Earth would be drawn closer to the supergiant, likely altering its orbital velocity.
-
Orbital Speed and Year Length: According to Kepler's laws of planetary motion, the orbital speed of a planet depends on both its distance from the star and the mass of the star. In this case, while the gravity would be stronger, assuming Earth remains in a stable orbit (albeit possibly at a shorter distance), its orbital speed would likely increase, meaning that the period of Earth's orbit (one year) would become shorter.
-
Day Length and Gravity: The gravitational pull from a more massive star would also be stronger on Earth, which would mean that Earth's rotation is not necessarily affected in the same way as its orbital dynamics. However, if Earth were trapped in a more eccentric orbit or subjected to tidal forces due to the mass of the supergiant, these could theoretically affect its rotation. But in straightforward terms, the day would not necessarily become longer simply because of stronger gravity; rather, it might remain roughly the same.
Considering all of this, the most accurate choice given the scenario would be:
A year on Earth would be shorter because Earth's orbital speed would increase.