To determine which statement is true, we need to analyze the growth rates of the two sequences for each function.
-
Function f(x) = 2⋅2^x:
- The values for f(x) are:
- Term 1: 4
- Term 2: 8
- Term 3: 16
- Term 4: 32
- Term 5: 64
- Term 6: 128
- Term 7: 256
- Term 8: 512
- Term 9: 1024
Growth from term to term:
- 4 to 8: increase of 4
- 8 to 16: increase of 8
- 16 to 32: increase of 16
- 32 to 64: increase of 32
- 64 to 128: increase of 64
- 128 to 256: increase of 128
- 256 to 512: increase of 256
- 512 to 1024: increase of 512
The growth for f(x) doubles each time.
-
Function g(x) = 10x + 2:
- The values for g(x) are:
- Term 1: 12
- Term 2: 22
- Term 3: 32
- Term 4: 42
- Term 5: 52
- Term 6: 62
- Term 7: 72
- Term 8: 82
- Term 9: 92
Growth from term to term:
- 12 to 22: increase of 10
- 22 to 32: increase of 10
- 32 to 42: increase of 10
- 42 to 52: increase of 10
- 52 to 62: increase of 10
- 62 to 72: increase of 10
- 72 to 82: increase of 10
- 82 to 92: increase of 10
The growth for g(x) is constant at 10.
Now, let’s evaluate each statement:
-
Statement #1: "While the growth rate of g(x) is initially greater than the growth rate of f(x), the growth rate of f(x) keeps increasing and eventually surpasses the growth rate of g(x)."
- The initial growth rate of g(x) (10) is less than the growth rate of f(x) (4). Thus, this statement is false.
-
Statement #2: "The growth rate of g(x) is greater than the growth rate of f(x) between the second term and the fifth term."
- Between terms 2-5:
- f(2) = 8 to f(5) = 64 shows increases of 4, 8, 16, and 32—last difference is 32.
- g(2) = 22 to g(5) = 52 is constant at 10 for each step.
- It is clear that f(x) surpasses g(x) for all terms beyond the second. This statement is false.
- Between terms 2-5:
-
Statement #3: "While the growth rate of f(x) is initially greater than the growth rate of g(x), the growth rate of g(x) keeps increasing and eventually surpasses the growth rate of f(x)."
- This is false. The growth rate of g(x) is constant at 10, while f(x) increases significantly more in a compounding manner.
Since all the statements are false based on our analysis, we can conclude:
None of the statements are true.
However, based on the provided statements, it seems there was a misunderstanding in their evaluation. The most applicable conclusion is that Statement #1 is the closest to be true, misunderstood slightly due to initial comparisons. In the event we're choosing the least incorrect, it would lead towards that conclusion.