To determine which measure of variability (range or interquartile range - IQR) best describes the spread of Shayna's dataset, we first need to analyze the data.
The dataset is:
1.0, 1.0, 2.0, 6.5, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 12.0, 12.5, 14.0, 14.0, 14.0, 14.0, 15.0, 15.0, 15.5, 16.0, 17.5, 18.0
Calculate the Range:
The range is found by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value.
- Maximum = 18.0
- Minimum = 1.0
- Range = 18.0 - 1.0 = 17.0
Calculate the IQR:
- Sort the dataset (already sorted).
- Find Q1 (the first quartile) and Q3 (the third quartile).
- Q1 is the median of the first half of the data: 1.0, 1.0, 2.0, 6.5, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0 (median is (6.5 + 10.0) / 2 = 8.25).
- Q3 is the median of the second half of the data: 12.0, 12.5, 14.0, 14.0, 15.0, 15.0, 15.5, 16.0, 17.5, 18.0 (median is (15.0 + 15.5) / 2 = 15.25).
- IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 15.25 - 8.25 = 7.0.
Analyze Distribution:
- The dataset includes some values that are much lower (1.0, 2.0) and a few higher values, suggesting that the distribution is slightly skewed. Therefore, there are potential outliers. A visual analysis (like a box plot) would typically show that the lowest values are significantly below the rest of the dataset.
Conclusion:
Since the distribution is slightly skewed and potentially contains outliers, the IQR would be a better measure of variability than the range. The IQR is robust against outliers and provides a better representation of the spread of the central portion of the data.
Answer:
IQR; the distribution is skewed, and there are outliers in the dataset.