Use the scenario to answer the question.

Student #1: There’s no point in trying to fight climate change as individuals. Governments need to get involved and start taking it seriously.
Student #2: Governments should have gotten involved a long time ago, but I still think it’s important for every person to do what they can. The most important thing is that we make progress.
In the context of this conversation, which claim most warrants justification?

(1 point)
Responses

There’s no point in trying to fight climate change as individuals.
There’s no point in trying to fight climate change as individuals.

The most important thing is that we make progress.
The most important thing is that we make progress.

Governments need to get involved and start taking it seriously.
Governments need to get involved and start taking it seriously.

Governments should have gotten involved a long time ago.
Governments should have gotten involved a long time ago.
Skip to navigation

1 answer

The claim that most warrants justification is: There’s no point in trying to fight climate change as individuals.

This statement is quite definitive and dismissive of individual actions in addressing climate change, which is a complex issue that often involves both individual and collective efforts. Justifying this claim would require a strong argument that demonstrates why individual actions are ineffective or why they should not be pursued, which is more challenging than the other claims in the conversation.