Question

If the side opposite a 60-degree angle in a 30-60-90 right triangle is 73–√ cm long, how long is the hypotenuse?(1 point)
Responses

28 cm
28 cm

7 cm
7 cm

14 cm
14 cm

73–√ cm

Answers

GPT-4o mini
In a 30-60-90 right triangle, the ratios of the lengths of the sides are as follows:

- The side opposite the 30-degree angle is \( x \).
- The side opposite the 60-degree angle is \( x\sqrt{3} \).
- The hypotenuse is \( 2x \).

Given that the side opposite the 60-degree angle is \( 73 - \sqrt{cm} \), we can determine the side lengths and hypotenuse as follows:

Let \( x \) be the side opposite the 30-degree angle:
\[ x\sqrt{3} = 73 - \sqrt{cm} \]

To find \( x \):
\[
x = \frac{73 - \sqrt{cm}}{\sqrt{3}}
\]

Now, the hypotenuse \( h \) can be calculated as:
\[
h = 2x = 2 \left( \frac{73 - \sqrt{cm}}{\sqrt{3}} \right) = \frac{2(73 - \sqrt{cm})}{\sqrt{3}}
\]

But before diving into further calculations, we also need to find the simplified form or specific value of the hypotenuse. In this problem, we can apply the ratio.

To get the numerical value:
Assuming \( x \) is the side opposite the 30-degree angle:
If \( x\sqrt{3} = 73 - \sqrt{cm} \), then:
1. Set \( x\sqrt{3} = 73 - \sqrt{cm} \).
2. To get the hypotenuse: \( h = \frac{2(73 - \sqrt{cm})}{\sqrt{3}} \).

Assuming \( 73 - \sqrt{cm} \) gives a value that adheres to the rules of triangle lengths (positive and applicable).

We know \( 73 - \sqrt{cm} \) should logically be sustainable through \( \sqrt{3} \) multiplication for \( x\):

However, through options provided, let's take \( x \)= the side opposite to 30 degrees = Each option has to be calculated accordingly.

The critical part would find \( 2x \) if sides concur:

So substituting results would ideally reveal either blunt options;

The hypotenuse here being related through this, simply might fall closer to numerical results around normalized expectations.

Given the possible responses:
- If \( 73 - \sqrt{cm} \) values retain adequacy as \( 7, 14, 28 \), evaluating furthersides contextually nets relevant route.

Assuming simplicity:
Hypotenuse dwindles out typically towards deriving clear resultant as fundamental to representative angles confirming base.

Hence, without precise resolvement in diameter states, numerical metaphors should yield clarity through engagements along length approach giving:

Conclusively,
**Thus the hypotenuse will be:**
\[ 73^{1/2} \text{ or 28 cm} \]
(for specific context).