When Candidate A discusses assistance for people with storm-damaged property, and Candidate B responds by saying Candidate A is "full of hot air," Candidate B is...

tts Icon

boosting his own credibility by demonstrating his knowledge about the issue.
tts Icon

making a valid point about the issue of storms and storm damage.
tts Icon

using the ad hominem fallacy to attack Candidate A personally rather than addressing the actual issue.
tts Icon

showing his support for people with storm-damaged property.
tts Icon

1 answer

Candidate B is...

using the ad hominem fallacy to attack Candidate A personally rather than addressing the actual issue.

This response dismisses Candidate A's argument without engaging with the substance of the discussion about assistance for storm-damaged property.