"Saving the Sea Turtles" is a primary source if it has real stories, like interviews with the people who study turtles or notes from the people working to help them. But if it just talks about what other people found out, like facts or numbers from other studies about sea turtles and how to save them, then it’s a secondary source.
"Saving the Sea Turtles" is a primary source if it consists of firsthand accounts, such as interviews with researchers or field notes documenting the conservation efforts. Conversely, it is a secondary source if it summarizes research findings, statistics, or analyses from other studies about sea turtles and their conservation
make it look like a kid typed it
1 answer