To find the area of the figure based on the provided dimensions, we will assume that the figure described is a composite shape (like a rectangle or combination of rectangles).
However, the provided dimensions (3m, 3m, 4m, 3m, 3m, 1.5m, 10m, and 7.5m) may correspond to different sections of the figure. To identify the area accurately, we usually need a clearer representation or more context about how these dimensions are arranged.
Given that this information is not providing enough structure, let's analyze it intuitively.
If we take the dimensions to calculate the area of a rectangle or multiple rectangles based on some arrangements:
- Assume a rectangle with dimensions 10m and 7.5m: \[ \text{Area} = \text{length} \times \text{width} = 10m \times 7.5m = 75 m^2. \]
This area seems to be too large given the options provided.
Let's consider possible combinations:
- If we take smaller sections and assume they are laid out in a way that leads to an area less than the calculated large rectangle.
Without precise arrangements, let's use logical deduction to approximate possible areas based on the given options of 27 m², 35 m², 36 m², and 45 m².
Upon reviewing possibilities, the most reasonable option could be:
- 36 m² (since it's a common area for a configuration that could fit with the assumed dimensions).
So, given the options and no explicit figure to derive exact areas through calculation:
- The closest answer based on potential configurations of the given dimensions would be 36 m².