To calculate the area of the figure, it would help to know the shape and arrangement of the dimensions given (3m, 3m, 4m, 3m, 3m, 1.5m, 10m, and 7.5m). Without that visual context, I can suggest that for a box, typically the area would be calculated as the length multiplied by the width.
Assuming the dimensions define a rectangle or a configuration of rectangles, let's evaluate the possible combinations based on typical areas.
-
If the figure is a rectangle:
- Using 10m and 3m, the area would be: \[ Area = 10m \times 3m = 30 m^2 \]
- Using 7.5m and 4m, the area would be: \[ Area = 7.5m \times 4m = 30 m^2 \]
-
If the figure consists of multiple parts:
- Summing up various portions could lead to other outcomes. However, without seeing the specific layout, it makes it difficult to get an accurate figure.
Given the choices:
- 27 m²
- 35 m²
- 36 m²
- 45 m²
To estimate again:
- If you add up lengths in a more complex configuration or adjacent areas together rather than just one rectangle, you can check combinations that could yield results reflected in those options.
Since I'm unable to visualize the configuration, it will be attentive for you to scrutinize how the labeled dimensions fit together. If it's rectangular or squares adjacent to each other, the area with provided data could average out to specific figures like 36 m² or 45 m² if more lengths are added.
If you have further context or adjustments based on visible configurations or total aspects, please share it, and I can assess further.