Question

f one considers Ballard’s
(2013: 229) definition of the narrative burden as “the context and the crucible wherein
adoptees struggle with issues of racism, privacy, and identity formation”, could one not argue
that Angela Tucker imposes a narrative burden on her first- and adoptive parents in the
documentary Closure (dir. Tucker, 2013). By providing a thorough analysis of this
documentary as an adoption narrative, reflect on whether the narrative burden applies only to
adoptees and whether it is possible for one or more members of the triad to impose a similar
burden on other members of the triad

Answers

GPT-4o mini
Angela Tucker's documentary *Closure* (2013) offers a compelling exploration of her journey as an adoptee searching for answers about her origins. Within the framework of Ballard’s definition of the narrative burden—which underscores the complex emotional and contextual struggles faced by adoptees—one can examine how this burden can indeed extend beyond just the adoptee to encompass adoptive and birth parents.

In *Closure*, Tucker navigates themes of identity, race, and the often painful quest for self-understanding that many adoptees face. These struggles reflect not only her personal narrative but also the larger socio-cultural elements that influence the adoptee experience. The film positions Tucker's biological parents as key figures in her narrative, illustrating how her search impacts them while also revealing their own struggles with identity, guilt, and societal perceptions.

The narrative burden, as described by Ballard, can thus be understood as a shared experience among all members of the adoption triad—birth parents, adoptive parents, and adoptees. When Tucker delves into her birth and adoptive families' histories, she invites viewers to consider how each member experiences their own narrative burdens. For instance, Tucker's adoptive parents may grapple with feelings of inadequacy or fear of losing her to her biological family, while her biological parents navigate the complexities of their past choices and their impact on their daughter’s life.

By showcasing her journey, Tucker may inadvertently impose a narrative burden on her parents. This can manifest in various ways: her adoptive parents may have to confront their feelings of being secondary in her life, while her biological parents might face the emotional weight of their past decisions and the sense of responsibility towards their child's well-being. Through this process, each individual's struggles become interwoven, complicating the notion of who bears the narrative burden in adoption.

Moreover, this phenomenon of imposing narrative burdens is reciprocal. Adoptees often bring their histories and emotional landscapes into relationships with their adoptive and birth parents, which can create an expectation for these parents to address or validate the adoptee's feelings and experiences. In doing so, they may unintentionally become bearers of a burden themselves—one that stems from unmet expectations, unresolved emotions, or the desire for understanding and connection.

In conclusion, the narrative burden is not solely the responsibility of the adoptee; it is a complex intertwining of experiences that can resonate across the entire adoption triad. Angela Tucker's *Closure* serves as a poignant example of this interconnectedness, illuminating how the quests for identity, understanding, and acceptance can impose burdens reciprocally among all members involved. The documentary invites reflection on how these narratives shape relationships and highlight the shared emotional landscapes inherent in the adoption experience.