Introduction 1:

Use the passages to answer the question.

Did you know there is an alien civilization living on the moon? According
to an 1835 headline of The New York Sun, it's a true story. In fact, the

How are these introductory sections different?

story made lots of money for the newspaper. Fake news has been
around for centuries, but the stakes for readers are much higher in

(1 point)

today's world of social media. Spreading misinformation about
important topics-elections, vaccinations, pandemics, and so on-can

Unlike Introduction 2, Introduction 1 challenges the behaviors

alter the way people behave and put them at risk. Because of the

of readers.

inherent danger in fake news, social media platforms need to take
responsibility for the fake news being spread across their sites and

Unlike Introduction 1, Introduction 2 appeals to a general

make sure it is deleted immediately.

audience.

Introduction 2:

Unlike Introduction 1, Introduction 2 relies on concise and
focused language.

When was the last time you fact checked a news story you shared on
social media or retold to a friend? If the answer was "never," you are not

Unlike Introduction 2, Introduction 1 uses a humorous hook

alone. Fake news has spread like wildfire across social media sites, and

to engage readers.

the impact on people's behavior is real and documented. Although
social media platforms attempt to limit the spread of damaging fake
news, they ultimately fail. The onus of stopping the spread of fake news
relies on social media users. The only effective way to stop the spread
of fake news is for every reader to check the veracity of an article
before sharing the information, whether online or in person.

1 answer

The two introductions exhibit different approaches to engaging the reader and addressing the topic of fake news:

  1. Tone and Engagement:

    • Introduction 1 uses a whimsical and humorous hook by referencing a fictional story about an alien civilization on the moon, which draws the reader in with curiosity and a sense of intrigue regarding the nature of fake news. This approach challenges readers by highlighting the historical nature of misinformation and its contemporary implications.
    • Introduction 2, on the other hand, takes a direct and more serious tone by asking the reader about their personal habits regarding fact-checking news stories. This engages the audience in self-reflection but does not employ humor or a playful hook.
  2. Focus and Audience Appeal:

    • Introduction 1 appeals to readers by provoking thought about the consequences of misinformation and calling for social media platforms to take responsibility. It challenges behaviors by stressing the dangers of fake news in a more dramatic way.
    • Introduction 2 appeals to a broader audience by addressing collective responsibility while maintaining a focused message on the importance of individual action in combating fake news. It emphasizes the need for users to verify information before sharing, positioning the responsibility on the reader rather than external entities.
  3. Language and Style:

    • Introduction 1 incorporates more narrative elements and historical context, providing depth and engaging storytelling.
    • Introduction 2 adopts a concise and focused approach, delivering clear and actionable advice without additional narrative embellishments.

Overall, while both introductions tackle the same subject, they differ significantly in tone, engagement strategy, audience appeal, and writing style.