Which of the following best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.

People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.

The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.

Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.

Answer 1

The best explanation among the provided options for why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades is:

The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.

This option highlights the perception that newer frameworks and human rights documents may address a broader array of rights and issues, leading to a comparative evaluation that might diminish the contemporary regard for the Bill of Rights.