Let's review Kelsey's solution step by step to determine where the mistake was made.
System of Equations:
- Line A: \( 8x + 4y = 12 \)
- Line B: \( y = 2x - 5 \)
Step 1:
Kelsey substitutes \( y \) from Line B into Line A:
\[ 8x + 4(2x - 5) = 12 \]
This substitution is correct.
Step 2:
Now, Kelsey simplified the equation:
\[ 8x + 8x - 20 = 12 \] \[ 16x - 20 = 12 \] \[ 16x = 32 \]
This part is also correct, leading to:
\[ x = 2 \] (This is where a mistake is introduced in stating \( 2 = x \) instead of \( x = 2 \).)
Step 3:
Substituting \( x = 2 \) back to find \( y \): Substitute \( x = 2 \) into Line B:
\[ y = 2(2) - 5 \] \[ y = 4 - 5 \] \[ y = -1 \]
Kelsey mistakenly substitutes \( x \) back into Line A:
\[ 8(2) + 4y = 12 \] \[ 16 + 4y = 12 \] \[ 4y = 12 - 16 \] \[ 4y = -4 \] \[ y = -1 \]
Correction Needed:
In Step 2, when solving for \( x \), Kelsey improperly notes it as \( 2 = x \) instead of \( x = 2 \). However, the substitution into Line A in Step 3 was correct after finding \( x = 2 \), but instead of writing \( x = 1/2 \), he should have written \( x = 2 \).
Final ordered pair:
The correct ordered pair solution for the system of equations is \( (2, -1) \), not \( (2, 1/2) \).