“The Divided House”

As Anna stood on the porch of her Virginia farmhouse, she watched her brother, Daniel, march off to fight for the South. Her father remained silent, staring at the ground, while her mother wrung her hands nervously. Anna’s heart was torn. How could her brother leave when she believed so strongly that slavery was wrong? How could she reconcile the love for her family with the pain of their choices?



12. In “The Divided House,” how does Anna’s perspective on slavery and war differ from her brother’s, and what effect does this have on the story?

1 answer

In “The Divided House,” Anna’s perspective on slavery is rooted in her moral conviction that it is fundamentally wrong, reflecting a more progressive understanding of human rights and personal dignity. In contrast, her brother Daniel is aligned with the Southern cause, viewing the war as a duty to his state and upholding the social and economic structures of the Confederacy, including the institution of slavery. This ideological clash creates a profound internal conflict for Anna, who is caught between her familial loyalty and her ethical beliefs.

The effect of this difference in perspective is significant for the story. It serves to highlight the broader societal tensions during the Civil War, illustrating how families were often torn apart by the conflict. Anna’s struggle symbolizes the painful choices many individuals faced during this tumultuous time, emphasizing themes of family loyalty, moral conviction, and the complexities of human relationships amidst moral dilemmas. This tension drives the narrative forward, creating an emotional depth that engages the reader and invites reflection on the personal implications of larger historical events. Anna's internal conflict ultimately serves as a lens through which the reader can explore the differing motivations behind the war and the personal consequences of divided loyalties.