Question
Study the graph of Russian military spending.
A line graph titled Russian Military Spending from 1992 to 2012. The x-axis is labeled Year from 1992 to 2012. The y-axis is labeled Spending in billions of dollars from 0 to 100. Spending was about 70 billion in 1992. In 1998, spending was near 20 billion. In 2012, spending was over 90 billion.
What can be concluded from the data about Russian military spending?
It has been irregular since the transition to democracy.
It has expanded greatly since the transition to democracy.
It has not been a high priority following the transition to democracy.
It experienced an immediate increase following the transition to democracy.
A line graph titled Russian Military Spending from 1992 to 2012. The x-axis is labeled Year from 1992 to 2012. The y-axis is labeled Spending in billions of dollars from 0 to 100. Spending was about 70 billion in 1992. In 1998, spending was near 20 billion. In 2012, spending was over 90 billion.
What can be concluded from the data about Russian military spending?
It has been irregular since the transition to democracy.
It has expanded greatly since the transition to democracy.
It has not been a high priority following the transition to democracy.
It experienced an immediate increase following the transition to democracy.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Based on the information provided about the graph of Russian military spending from 1992 to 2012, we can conclude the following:
- The spending was about 70 billion in 1992 but dropped significantly to near 20 billion in 1998, indicating a substantial decline during the post-Soviet transition period.
- However, by 2012, spending rose to over 90 billion, showing a significant increase over the later years.
Considering these trends, the most accurate conclusion would be:
**It has expanded greatly since the transition to democracy.**
The other options do not accurately represent the data:
- "It has been irregular since the transition to democracy" might be partially true due to fluctuations, but it does not capture the overall trend of significant growth in later years.
- "It has not been a high priority following the transition to democracy" contradicts the increase observed by 2012.
- "It experienced an immediate increase following the transition to democracy" is incorrect since there was a significant drop in spending before the eventual rise.
- The spending was about 70 billion in 1992 but dropped significantly to near 20 billion in 1998, indicating a substantial decline during the post-Soviet transition period.
- However, by 2012, spending rose to over 90 billion, showing a significant increase over the later years.
Considering these trends, the most accurate conclusion would be:
**It has expanded greatly since the transition to democracy.**
The other options do not accurately represent the data:
- "It has been irregular since the transition to democracy" might be partially true due to fluctuations, but it does not capture the overall trend of significant growth in later years.
- "It has not been a high priority following the transition to democracy" contradicts the increase observed by 2012.
- "It experienced an immediate increase following the transition to democracy" is incorrect since there was a significant drop in spending before the eventual rise.