To determine the advantage of the way the first author addresses the argument compared to the second author, we would need to assess the rhetorical strategies and styles each author employs. Based on the provided options:
A) This option suggests that the first author relies on logical reasoning, whereas the second author does not. This could be an advantage if the audience values rational argumentation.
B) This option indicates that the first author uses more concise language, making their ideas clearer. Clarity can significantly improve the effectiveness of communication.
C) This option implies that the second author has a broader appeal, which can be advantageous in reaching a larger audience but does not directly compare favorably to the first author.
D) This option states that the first author’s methods inspire action more effectively, which would be an advantage if the goal is to motivate readers to take specific steps.
Without specific context about the authors and their arguments, it's difficult to choose definitively. However, if clarity and concise diction are prioritized, B) the first author uses more concise diction, and therefore his ideas are clearer could be a strong advantage, as clear communication often leads to better understanding and engagement from the audience.
Ultimately, the best choice would depend on the context provided by the specific arguments of each author.