Question
A) Which statement is true about winner-take-all allocation of electors? (1 point)
Winner-take-all allocation of electors was decided by the Framers of the Constitution and is enforced by the federal government.
Winner-take-all applies to all U.S. elections, not just elector allocation in the presidential election.
Winner-take-all allocation makes the presidential election more competitive in most states.
Winner-take-all creates safe states and battleground states in presidential elections.
Winner-take-all allocation of electors was decided by the Framers of the Constitution and is enforced by the federal government.
Winner-take-all applies to all U.S. elections, not just elector allocation in the presidential election.
Winner-take-all allocation makes the presidential election more competitive in most states.
Winner-take-all creates safe states and battleground states in presidential elections.
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The true statement about winner-take-all allocation of electors is:
**Winner-take-all creates safe states and battleground states in presidential elections.**
This is because winner-take-all systems tend to solidify political support in certain states, leading to some states consistently voting for one party (safe states) while other states are more competitive and can swing between parties (battleground states).
**Winner-take-all creates safe states and battleground states in presidential elections.**
This is because winner-take-all systems tend to solidify political support in certain states, leading to some states consistently voting for one party (safe states) while other states are more competitive and can swing between parties (battleground states).